Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of FDORfc40

Timestamp:

06/26/09 17:52:39 (15 years ago)

Author:

zspitzer

Comment:

--

FDORfc40

@@ +1 @@
+= FDO RFC 40 - Support for Ordering =
+
+This page contains a request for comments document (RFC) for the FDO Open Source project.  
+More FDO RFCs can be found on the [wiki:FDORfcs RFCs] page.
+
+== Status == 
+ 
+||RFC Template Version||(1.0)|| 
+||Submission Date||(Date/Time submitted)||
+||Last Modified||Zac Spitzer [[Timestamp]]||
+||Author||Zac Spitzer||
+||RFC Status||(draft)||
+||Implementation Status||(pending)||
+||Proposed Milestone||(e.g. 3.5)||
+||Assigned PSC guide(s)||(when determined)||
+ 
+== Overview ==
+
+FDO currently has no standardised support for result set ordering.
+
+== Motivation ==
+
+Ordering is a very commonly used operation with databases. 
+
+Clients such as MapGuide can support rendering of complex roads networks
+if the resultset are ordered, allowing major features to be rendered atop
+minor features.
+
+[http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc69] would require such support.
+
+== Proposed Solution ==
+
+Add support for ordering to the FDO spec. 
+
+Help Wanted
+
+== Implications ==
+
+TBD
+
+== Test Plan ==
+
+TBD
+
+== Funding/Resources ==
+
+Help Wanted
+
+== Related Trac Tickets ==
+
+[http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc69][[BR]]
+#618 Theming stylisation order isn't respected in a layer[[BR]]
+[http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/ticket/516  FDO Core enhancment: support standard ORDER BY expressions]
+
+== Discussions ==
+[http://n2.nabble.com/RE%3A--fdo-trac---516%3A-FDO-Core-enhancment%3A-support-standard-ORDER-BY-expressions-td2741343.html#a2741343][[BR]]
+[http://n2.nabble.com/MapGuide-RFC-69---Rendering-Layer-Styles-using-Style-Order-td3158848.html][[BR]]
+[http://n2.nabble.com/RE%3A-MapGuide-RFC-69---Rendering-Layer-Styles-td3159460.html]