wiki:MapGuideRfc117

Version 6 (modified by jng, 13 years ago) ( diff )

--

MapGuide RFC 117 - Desktop Platform API

This page contains a change request (RFC) for the MapGuide Open Source project. More MapGuide RFCs can be found on the RFCs page.

Status

RFC Template Version(1.0)
Submission Date20 June 2011
Last Modified20 June 2011
AuthorJackie Ng
RFC Statusdraft
Implementation Statuspending
Proposed Milestone2.3
Assigned PSC guide(s)(when determined)
Voting History(vote date)
+1
+0
-0
-1
no vote

Overview

This RFC proposes a desktop-based implementation of the MapGuide Platform API.

Motivation

Snipped from the ​Futures article ...

MapGuide contains all of the features of a great desktop mapping component: Data access, rudimentary GIS, stylization and more.

Although the current build is tightly bound to a server service, it would be useful to create a build profile (free of any server dependencies) that provided a desktop developer to quickly add spatial visualisation and interactivity to their application.

The web and server-centric nature of MapGuide means that it is currently not possible to have a truly disconnected desktop client mapping application. Under MapGuide 6.5, this was somewhat possible by using the technique of embedding the ActiveX viewer control and loading a MWF filled with static layer data. Under the current MapGuide, there is nothing that approaches this kind of setup in terms of installation and resource footprint. Currently, if you want to build a MapGuide "desktop" application, you have to have a MapGuide Server and Web Tier present on the desktop and incur the overhead of having both of these running at the same time.

Clayton Hotson's ​AU 2009 Presentation showed that it was indeed possible to utilize components of the MapGuide stack outside of the MapGuide Server to create applications that have no server or web tier dependencies (in the case of the AU presentation: A map renderer).

The MapGuide Platform API itself is already modular and abstract enough to have an implementation in MapGuide/AIMS and another implementation in AutoCAD Map3D. What would be really nice is to take the concepts from that presentation to its logical conclusion, into a separate desktop-based implementation of the MapGuide Platform API

Proposed Solution

A desktop-implementation of the MapGuide API currently exists on ​Google Code. This desktop API implements the abstract classes and interfaces defined in the Platform API:

In addition, several MapGuide Server-specific APIs have also been ported across:

In terms of implementation details:

MgFeatureService for the desktop is a thin wrapper around FDO. Each service API maps to its corresponding FDO command.

MgResourceService for the desktop wraps a pre-defined directory on the native filesystem. Package loading is also implemented allowing for spatial data portability between a MapGuide Server and an application using the Desktop Platform API.

MgMapBase, MgLayerBase and MgSelectionBase are near 1:1 copies of their MapGuide Server counterparts. Because the desktop implementation does not have to address http statelessness like the MapGuide Web API, the Open() and Save() and Create() methods of MgMapBase are not required and have been removed from the desktop implementation.

MgFeatureReader, MgDataReader and MgSqlDataReader wraps their respective FDO reader interfaces.

This desktop implementation fulfils the data access (MgFeatureService) and rendering/stylization (MgRenderingService) requirements needed to build a functional desktop mapping application.

This desktop implementation also includes a functional .net wrapper API, created via the existing SWIG infrastructure already present in the MapGuide source tree.

Due to the tight dependency on server code, certain object caching and pooling mechanisms are omitted from the desktop implementation.

As already mentioned, the desktop implementation does not have to address http statelessness like the MapGuide Web API, as such certain concepts no longer apply when moving to the desktop:

  • Sessions
  • Map names
  • Authentication
  • Resource Security

As a result, the code you would write has been greatly simplified. Here's some examples (in .net)

Creating a runtime map: 

using OSGeo.MapGuide;

...

public void CreateMap()
{
   MgResourceIdentifier mapId = new MgResourceIdentifier("Library://Samples/Sheboygan/Maps/Sheboygan.MapDefinition");

   MgdMap map = new MgdMap(mapId);

   //That's it! You can now pass it to MgRenderingService to render images
   //No need to Open() or Save() like you would normally do with the
   //MapGuide Web API
}

Accessing Services: 

using OSGeo.MapGuide;
...

public void CreateServices()
{
   //Use the MgServiceFactory class to create your required services

   MgdFeatureService featSvc = MgServiceFactory.CreateFeatureService();
   MgdResourceService resSvc = MgServiceFactory.CreateResourceService();
   MgRenderingService renSvc = MgServiceFactory.CreateRenderingService();
}

Staying close to the naming conventions established in MapGuide, the desktop implementations of abstract classes in PlatformBase are prefixed "Mgd". Thus MgdMap is the desktop implementation of MgMapBase, MgdFeatureService is the desktop implementation of MgFeatureService, etc, etc. All these implementations can be upcasted, allowing them to be used with any existing code that targets these parent classes, allowing for the same level of code reuse that currently exists between AutoCAD Map3D and MapGuide.

This RFC proposes that the desktop implementation that currently resides in Google Code be integrated into the offical MapGuide Source Tree. Doing so allows us to have a desktop API that will automatically gain all the enhancements/bugfixes that are made to the shared components. In addition, we can reuse the existing SWIG recipe files because both desktop and server will be using the same header files, allowing for reusable .net wrapper assemblies. The SWIG recipe files hosted on Google Code currently generate a monolithic .net assembly.

Implications

Like AutoCAD Map3D, certain aspects of the Platform API does not translate cleanly from the MapGuide Server context. As such the following functionality is currently not implemented (and throws MgNotImplementedException when invoked).

In terms of compatibility, existing MapGuide application code is compatible at the source code level provided the code is targeting the subset of the MapGuide API that is supported and implemented by this desktop API.

Once integrated into the MapGuide Source tree, it is possible for binary compatibility provided the client application is targeting the same shared wrapper components (Foundation, Geometry, PlatformBase, MdfModel, MdfParser) and that the desktop and server were built from the same source code revision as the desktop API can utilise the existing SWIG recipe files. Or to put it in simpler words: A .net application that references:

Should be able to work on the desktop API, which would have identically generated assemblies.

It is planned, should this RFC be approved, to put the migrated source into a "Desktop" top-level directory under MgDev. This will have minimal impact on the rest of the source tree.

Also if it hasn't been made clear already, this RFC only concerns the desktop API and not something like a desktop map viewer. The intention behind this RFC is to add the infrastructure to make it possible for such applications to be created. A desktop map viewer may exist in the future as a separate RFC.

There are no plans to make this desktop API production ready for the 2.3 milestone. The scope of this RFC is to simply have the source of the desktop implementation integrated into the MapGuide source tree in a functional state by that stage. Unless there is interest from Autodesk, maintenance and enhancement of this codebase to keep up to date with future upstream platform and component changes will be a community responsibility

Although care has been taken to avoid using windows-specific APIs, this current implementation currently only builds on Windows. Support for Linux is beyond the scope of this RFC and will be handled separately in a future date.

Test Plan

The desktop implementation already uses a near-identical test suite as the MapGuide Server and thus already has the same level of code coverage.

Funding / Resources

Community

Note: See TracWiki for help on using the wiki.