Changes between Version 18 and Version 19 of MapGuideRfc19


Ignore:
Timestamp:
04/20/07 15:03:22 (18 years ago)
Author:
brucedechant
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • MapGuideRfc19

    v18 v19  
    1111||Last Modified||Bruce Dechant [[Timestamp]]||
    1212||Author||Bruce Dechant||
    13 ||RFC Status||Draft||
    14 ||Implementation Status||Pending||
     13||RFC Status||adopted||
     14||Implementation Status||pending||
    1515||Proposed Milestone||1.2||
    1616||Assigned PSC guide(s)||Robert Bray||
    17 ||'''Voting History'''||||
    18 ||+1||||
    19 ||+0||||
     17||'''Voting History'''||April 20, 2007||
     18||+1||Bob, Bruce, Jason, Tom||
     19||+0||Paul||
    2020||-0||||
    2121||-1||||
     
    2323== Overview ==
    2424
    25 The purpose of this RFC is to support a way of limiting the # of concurrent FDO provider connections to a specific provider. By allowing for a way to limit the # of concurrent FDO provider connections the server can support single threaded providers and any provider that has a limit on the # of client connections (ie: Oracle, etc...).
     25The purpose of this RFC is to support a way of limiting the # of concurrent FDO provider connections to a specific provider.
    2626
    2727== Motivation ==
    2828
    29 Currently, the server only supports FDO providers that support a thread-per-connection or better thread model. Without implementing this RFC there will be no support for single-threaded providers or for limiting the # of concurrent FDO provider connections.
     29By allowing for a way to limit the # of concurrent FDO provider connections the server can support single threaded providers and any provider that has a limit on the # of client connections (ie: Oracle, etc...).
    3030
    3131Note: The existing releases of !MapGuide did not check the provider thread model and subsequently allowed single-threaded providers to be used albeit in an unsafe manner.