Changes between Version 18 and Version 19 of MapGuideRfc19
- Timestamp:
- 04/20/07 15:03:22 (18 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
MapGuideRfc19
v18 v19 11 11 ||Last Modified||Bruce Dechant [[Timestamp]]|| 12 12 ||Author||Bruce Dechant|| 13 ||RFC Status|| Draft||14 ||Implementation Status|| Pending||13 ||RFC Status||adopted|| 14 ||Implementation Status||pending|| 15 15 ||Proposed Milestone||1.2|| 16 16 ||Assigned PSC guide(s)||Robert Bray|| 17 ||'''Voting History'''|| ||18 ||+1|| ||19 ||+0|| ||17 ||'''Voting History'''||April 20, 2007|| 18 ||+1||Bob, Bruce, Jason, Tom|| 19 ||+0||Paul|| 20 20 ||-0|||| 21 21 ||-1|||| … … 23 23 == Overview == 24 24 25 The purpose of this RFC is to support a way of limiting the # of concurrent FDO provider connections to a specific provider. By allowing for a way to limit the # of concurrent FDO provider connections the server can support single threaded providers and any provider that has a limit on the # of client connections (ie: Oracle, etc...).25 The purpose of this RFC is to support a way of limiting the # of concurrent FDO provider connections to a specific provider. 26 26 27 27 == Motivation == 28 28 29 Currently, the server only supports FDO providers that support a thread-per-connection or better thread model. Without implementing this RFC there will be no support for single-threaded providers or for limiting the # of concurrent FDO provider connections.29 By allowing for a way to limit the # of concurrent FDO provider connections the server can support single threaded providers and any provider that has a limit on the # of client connections (ie: Oracle, etc...). 30 30 31 31 Note: The existing releases of !MapGuide did not check the provider thread model and subsequently allowed single-threaded providers to be used albeit in an unsafe manner.