Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of MapGuideRfc25
- Timestamp:
- 08/08/07 18:25:51 (17 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
MapGuideRfc25
v2 v3 8 8 9 9 ||RFC Template Version||(1.0)|| 10 ||Submission Date|| (Date/Time submitted)||10 ||Submission Date||August 8, 2007|| 11 11 ||Last Modified||Jason Chen [[Timestamp]]|| 12 12 ||Author||Jason Chen|| 13 ||RFC Status|| (draft, proposed, frozen for vote, adopted, retracted, or rejected)||14 ||Implementation Status||under development )||15 ||Proposed Milestone||1. 1||13 ||RFC Status||proposed (draft, proposed, frozen for vote, adopted, retracted, or rejected)|| 14 ||Implementation Status||under development|| 15 ||Proposed Milestone||1.3|| 16 16 ||Assigned PSC guide(s)||(when determined)|| 17 ||'''Voting History'''|| (vote date)||18 ||+1|| 17 ||'''Voting History'''||August 8, 2007|| 18 ||+1||Tom, Chris, Bruce, Trevor, Jason|| 19 19 ||+0|| || 20 20 ||-0|| || … … 43 43 == Test Plan == 44 44 45 How the proposed change will be tested, if applicable. New unit tests should be detailed here??? 45 Tests need to be done after the upgrade: 46 47 * Resource Service unit tests must all pass. 48 * Feature Service unit tests must all pass. 49 * API test pages should be checked against the affected APIs. 46 50 47 51 == Funding/Resources == 48 52 49 This section will confirm that the proposed feature has enough support to proceed. This would typically mean that the entity making the changes would put forward the RFC, but a non-developer could act as an RFC author if they are sure they have the funding to cover the change.53 Supplied by Autodesk.