Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of MapGuideRfc56
- Timestamp:
- 10/06/08 10:23:44 (16 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
MapGuideRfc56
v2 v3 30 30 The proposal is to add support for the following parameters to the GETDYNAMICMAPOVERLAYIMAGE HTTP request format: 31 31 32 ||SETDISPLAYDPI|| 33 ||SETDISPLAYWIDTH|| 34 ||SETDISPLAYHEIGHT|| 35 ||SETVIEWSCALE|| 36 ||SETVIEWCENTERX|| 37 ||SETVIEWCENTERY|| 38 ||CLIENTAGENT|| 39 ||SHOWGROUPS|| 40 ||HIDEGROUPS|| 41 ||SHOWLAYERS|| 42 ||HIDELAYERS|| 32 ||SETDISPLAYDPI||Sets the display resolution in dots per inch|| 33 ||SETDISPLAYWIDTH||Sets the display width in pixels|| 34 ||SETDISPLAYHEIGHT||Sets the display height in pixels|| 35 ||SETVIEWSCALE||Sets the required view scale|| 36 ||SETVIEWCENTERX||Sets the view center point x coordinate in mapping coordinates|| 37 ||SETVIEWCENTERY||Sets the view center point y coordinate in mapping coordinates|| 38 ||SHOWGROUPS||Sets the list of groups to display|| 39 ||HIDEGROUPS||Sets the list of groups to hide|| 40 ||SHOWLAYERS||Sets the list of layers to display|| 41 ||HIDELAYERS||Sets the list of layers to hide|| 43 42 44 43 == Implications == 45 44 46 Th is section allows discussion of the repercussions of the change, such as whether there will be any breakage in backwards compatibility, if documentation will need to be updated, etc.45 The code to parse and apply the view setting parameters already exists in the MG web tier. Implementing it for GETDYNAMICMAPOVERLAYIMAGE is therefore very straightforward. No changes are required in the MG server code to support the change. 47 46 48 47 == Test Plan == 49 48 50 How the proposed change will be tested, if applicable. New unit tests should be detailed here??? 49 Web tier unit tests should be added to test the new parameters. 51 50 52 51 == Funding/Resources == 53 52 54 This section will confirm that the proposed feature has enough support to proceed. This would typically mean that the entity making the changes would put forward the RFC, but a non-developer could act as an RFC author if they are sure they have the funding to cover the change.53 Autodesk to provide resources.
