Changes between Version 4 and Version 5 of MapGuideRfc69
- Timestamp:
- 06/26/09 17:55:53 (15 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
MapGuideRfc69
v4 v5 29 29 ||[[Image(mapguide studio support for style ordering.png)]]||[[BR]] 30 30 31 Adding support to respect this ordering is considered to resource expensive, as many 32 individual queries would be required. 33 31 34 ||[[Image(sample map tile with unordered style rendering.png)]]|| 32 35 … … 42 45 providers such as SHP and FDO. 43 46 44 This would require a change to FDO 47 This would require a change to FDO [http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc40] 45 48 46 49 As this will add overhead, by taking the ordered approach, this could be turned 47 on by an optional field defining column(s) in the layer definition which defines 48 ordering. 50 on by an optional field defining ORDER BY column(s) in the layer definition . 49 51 50 52 == Implications == … … 62 64 == Related Trac Tickets == 63 65 66 [http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc40] 64 67 #618 Theming stylisation order isn't respected in a layer[[BR]] 65 68 [http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/ticket/516 FDO Core enhancment: support standard ORDER BY expressions]
