Opened 11 years ago
Last modified 11 years ago
#2364 closed task
Setup winnie with a mingw64 gcc 4.8.0 seh chain — at Version 2
Reported by: | robe | Owned by: | robe |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | medium | Milestone: | PostGIS 2.1.0 |
Component: | QA/buildbots | Version: | 2.1.x |
Keywords: | windows64, edb | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
As noted in #2339 switching my mingw64 build chain from gcc 4.5.4 to gcc 4.8.0 fixes all the regression failures when regressing against an EDB 9.3 64-bit install.
I'm setting up a separate self-standing install I'll call ming64gcc48 that I'll copy to winnie when I'm done and also make available for download for folks. This is the chain I'll be using to compile 9.3x64 (maybe 9.3 32-bit also since for some reason PL/V8 suffers same issues on 32-bit and i need my libstdc++ for 32-bit for pl/v8 to be same as postgis distributed) for final release and moving forward. The only snaffu is the issue with when building PostgreSQL that the libpq.dll make psql not work with:
psql: could not connect to server: Operation would block (0x00002733/10035) Is the server running on host "localhost" (::1) and accepting TCP/IP connections on port 5443? could not connect to server: Operation would block (0x00002733/10035) Is the server running on host "localhost" (127.0.0.1) and accepting TCP/IP connections on port 5443?
and in fact makes the make check for postgresql build fail with:
../../../src/test/regress/pg_regress --inputdir=. --temp-install=./tmp_check --t op-builddir=../../.. --dlpath=. --schedule=./parallel_schedule ============== creating temporary installation ============== ============== initializing database system ============== ============== starting postmaster ============== make[1]: *** [check] Error 58
I would like to get this issue fixed before I distribute a standalone that people can use. For the time being I can work around the issue by replacing the libpq.dll on the newly built postgres.
In looking over why I don't have this issue with prior 4.5.4 and why its only a complaint of folks running 4.8 (4.7 folks say it worked), I have discovered that gcc 4.8. is a new animal in and of itself and it might be the new stricter changes in 4.8 causing the issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/changes.html
New gcc conforms to the C++ 11 standard
In particular I was wondering about for example this:
GCC now uses a more aggressive analysis to derive an upper bound for the number of iterations of loops using constraints imposed by language standards. This may cause non-conforming programs to no longer work as expected, such as SPEC CPU 2006 464.h264ref and 416.gamess. A new option, -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations, was added to disable this aggressive analysis.
unfortunately sneaking it in like this did not seem to work or perhaps pg configure ignores it
./configure CFLAGS="-fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations ${CFLAGS}" ..
but I suspect I'm just doing this all wrong. I also wanted to try the new 4.8.1, but thought I would hold off on that since I got everything working so well with 4.8.0 and experimenting with 4.8.1 did not fix the above nagging issue
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
aha -- and they are even talking about that very switch in this postgresql thread
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/14242.1365200084@sss.pgh.pa.us (Back branches vs. gcc 4.8.0)
After quite a bit of hair-pulling trying to install Fedora 19 Alpha, I've been able to reproduce the initdb-time failure that's currently being seen on buildfarm member anchovy, and was also complained of recently by an end user: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOD=oQ-kq3Eg5SOvRYOVxDuqibVWC8R0wEivPsMGcyzZY-nfzA@mail.gmail.com
It is exactly what I suspected, namely that gcc 4.8.0 is applying an optimization that breaks our code; the odd thing though is that it's not breaking 9.2 or HEAD, just the older branches.