Opened 8 years ago

Last modified 5 years ago

#3605 closed defect

why do we have both _st_countagg_finalfn and __st_countagg_finalfn — at Initial Version

Reported by: robe Owned by: Bborie Park
Priority: medium Milestone: PostGIS 3.0.0
Component: raster Version: 2.2.x
Keywords: Cc:

Description

In going thru the code, I noticed for raster we have

_st_countagg_finalfn and st_countagg_finalfn

Why do we have one with _ and with .I first thought I made a mistake in my mass schema qualify calls work and introduced another underscore by accident, but I see the same thing in PostGIS 2.2 code.

Change History (0)

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.