Opened 2 years ago

Closed 2 years ago

#5154 closed defect (fixed)

raster ST_Value is undercosted

Reported by: robe Owned by: robe
Priority: medium Milestone: PostGIS 3.0.6
Component: raster Version: 3.2.x
Keywords: Cc:

Description

I'm noticing a case where parallelism is not kicking in with && and ST_Value , but is with ST_Intersects and ST_Value because the ST_Value function has a cost of 1.

Change History (6)

comment:1 by Regina Obe <lr@…>, 2 years ago

In ab3c325/git:

Add cost to ST_Value. References #5154 for PostGIS 3.0.6

In ab3c325/git:

Cost raster ST_Value. Reference #5154 for PostGIS 3.0.6

Version 1, edited 2 years ago by robe (previous) (next) (diff)

comment:2 by robe, 2 years ago

In 3360dbe6/git:

Add cost to ST_Value. References #5154 for PostGIS 3.1.6

comment:3 by Regina Obe <lr@…>, 2 years ago

In 3a62765/git:

revert accidental commit of deleted file.
References #5154 for PostGIS 3.1.6

comment:4 by robe, 2 years ago

Summary: ST_Value is undercosted → raster ST_Value is undercosted

comment:5 by Regina Obe <lr@…>, 2 years ago

In e174cec/git:

raster ST_Value is undercosted References #5154 for PostGIS 3.2.2

comment:6 by Regina Obe <lr@…>, 2 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: new → closed

In 2c22141/git:

raster ST_Value is undercosted Closes #5154 for PostGIS 3.3.0

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.