Opened 14 years ago

Last modified 13 years ago

#957 closed defect

[raster] rt_asgdalraster regress test fails — at Version 5

Reported by: strk Owned by: Bborie Park
Priority: medium Milestone: PostGIS 2.0.0
Component: raster Version: master
Keywords: Cc:

Description (last modified by strk) 

--- rt_asgdalraster_expected    2011-05-17 09:50:39.000000000 +0200
+++ /tmp/pgis_reg_9436/test_10_out      2011-05-17 17:05:26.000000000 +0200
@@ -11,5 +11,5 @@
 f0de16a21de438249ec0bbd28eafe63c
 ed4e4d60d2ccc82c4597e80c1f97272f
 83b6012757444ff7786b5e8473e6cea3
-b699be9f7045656edbb14ecec1c75b5a
-96a96f9a6d31544dfc5ba5cd25f40934
+f6fa7f8ae3c35c137a75acc855255083
+7031666f7a668577b9de9cc6a8799f75

The above is with PostgreSQL 8.4, PostGIS r7171, GDAL 1.9.0 revision 21597 on a 64bit system.

Change History (5)

comment:1 by Bborie Park, 14 years ago

Summary: raster regress errors, SELECT and some gdal → [raster] raster regress errors, SELECT and some gdal

The regression for rt_asgdalraster_expection is what concerns me. I'll have to test with GDAL 1.9.0 to see if that changed the output. My dev environment is PostgreSQL 9.0, PostGIS r7171, GDAL 1.8.0 on a 64-bit system.

And it would be nice if we could strip the "SELECT" lines out.

comment:2 by strk, 14 years ago

Summary: [raster] raster regress errors, SELECT and some gdal → [raster] rt_asgdalraster regress test fails

With r7173 only the GDAL one remains ("SELECT" stripped, only raster regression was having selects in output...)

comment:3 by Bborie Park, 14 years ago

Which revision of GDAL 1.9.0 are you using?

comment:4 by strk, 14 years ago

It's probably revision 21597 (checked from source tree, not installed binary, so not 100% sure).

comment:5 by strk, 14 years ago

Description: modified (diff)
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.