| | 1 | = AGENDA = |
| | 2 | |
| | 3 | * Release date / schedule |
| | 4 | * Features not yet implemented, but to be done? |
| | 5 | * GeoCoder future? |
| | 6 | * PostGIS 2.0 ticket triage? |
| | 7 | * Links between PostGIS and other (non-GEOS topology libraries) |
| | 8 | * Documentation / tutorials and starting points? (for raster? for topology?) |
| | 9 | * 3D visibility calculations? |
| | 10 | * Core vs Raster vs Topology |
| | 11 | |
| | 12 | |
| | 13 | = Features To Be Implemented Before Feature Freeze = |
| | 14 | |
| | 15 | * [raster] Two raster ST_Intersects (dustymugs - October 7) |
| | 16 | * [raster] Two raster version of MapAlgebra (dustymugs - Nov. 30) |
| | 17 | * [raster] Neighbor version of MapAlgebra (David - November 30) |
| | 18 | * [raster] C version of raster2pgsql (dustymugs - now!) |
| | 19 | * KNN GiST (PR mid-October) |
| | 20 | * GSERIALIZED clean-up (PR mid-October) |
| | 21 | * GML 3.2 ouput (OC end October) |
| | 22 | * 3D storage review (OC end November) |
| | 23 | * ST_GeomFromJSON (end September) |
| | 24 | * Extensions for deployment for 9.1 (eta 2011-11-15 - work out kinks) |
| | 25 | * [topology] Finish ISO functions set (strk - end October) |
| | 26 | * [topology] Geometry->TopoGeometry (strk - end November) |
| | 27 | * BOX (ENVELOPE?) as a GEOMETRY sub-class? (PR end November) |
| | 28 | * raster2pgsql as C utility instead of python (BP end November) |
| | 29 | |
| | 30 | = Release Date = |
| | 31 | |
| | 32 | * Feature Freeze (November 30) (this is a real freeze!!) |
| | 33 | * Q Branch (no!) |
| | 34 | * A No, branch at beta at the earliest. |
| | 35 | * Alpha-1 Release (December 1) |
| | 36 | * Developer Ticket Triage Event (January 5) |
| | 37 | * Beta-1 Release (January 31) |
| | 38 | * Branch? |
| | 39 | * Profit! |
| | 40 | |
| | 41 | = Boxes: Points of Discussion = |
| | 42 | |
| | 43 | * People want to sometime store boxes, how should they do ? |
| | 44 | * Polygon as boxes are kind of bigger than it could be |
| | 45 | * BOX2D lacks SRID (and is only 2d) |
| | 46 | * We have some more BOX%%% which make people confused (me, at least) |
| | 47 | * Having ops defined for boxes would allow extension (raster?) to only define casts to boxes in order to have proper indexing. |
| | 48 | * As per the indexing argument, the box I have in mind is the equivalent of the box which is cached in normal Geometries |
| | 49 | |
| | 50 | = GIT = |
| | 51 | |
| | 52 | * Discussion |
| | 53 | * Some are enthuastic |
| | 54 | * Others are +/-0 |
| | 55 | * General opinion, defer until 2.1 cycle (so that 2.1 comes out from git ? in that case we should start pretty soon after feature freeze, for any further development to happen) |
| | 56 | * Pierre raises BIG issue: trac/git integration |
| | 57 | * See http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/720 |
| | 58 | |
| | 59 | = Geocoder Discussion = |
| | 60 | |
| | 61 | * DBB, should it be part of core? |
| | 62 | * Dbitner, so many tickets are geocoder, distracting to project |
| | 63 | * extras/geocoder ticket category ? |
| | 64 | * Resolution: suck it up! Good functionality. |
| | 65 | |
| | 66 | = Core vs Raster vs Topology = |
| | 67 | |
| | 68 | * Should Raster be a mandatory part of the build and part of the postgis_core extention? |
| | 69 | * Answer: yes, if we can get a binary raster2pgsql loader completed. |
| | 70 | * strk is always against mandatory stuff... could default to ON and allow --without-raster |
| | 71 | * Implication: GDAL as mandatory dependency |
| | 72 | * Research: can we figure out SRID automatically on load using OGR |
| | 73 | |
| | 74 | = Raster Discussion = |
| | 75 | |
| | 76 | * Subtiling |
| | 77 | * Future development, support internal tiling scheme in the serialized form for raster (see: GDAL internal tiling / GeoTIFF internal tiling. 1 bit for tiled/not tiled and tile size will have to be fixed e.g. 100x100 or 256x256 otherwise we have to wait for 3.0) |
| | 78 | *raster2pgsql cleanup - Bug fixes and remove overviews |
| | 79 | * To be done using rt_api.c? (overviews as post-process SQL call) |
| | 80 | * yes |
| | 81 | * Aggregate versions of stats function (polygons versions?) |
| | 82 | * documentation section about Best practices and PostGIS Raster rationale |
| | 83 | * raster_column views? |
| | 84 | * weighted summary functions for |
| | 85 | |
| | 86 | = 3D external libraries discussion = |
| | 87 | |
| | 88 | * Can we start linking to other libraries for 3D support? |
| | 89 | * Yes, OK. |
| | 90 | |
