Changes between Version 14 and Version 15 of WKTRaster/FAQ
- Timestamp:
- 03/22/10 11:30:15 (15 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
WKTRaster/FAQ
v14 v15 11 11 The major advantage of one-georeference-by-raster over one-georeference-by-layer is to allow: 12 12 13 * coverages to be not necessarily rectangular (which is often the case of raster coverage covering large extents. See the possible raster arrang ments in the documentation)13 * coverages to be not necessarily rectangular (which is often the case of raster coverage covering large extents. See the possible raster arrangements in the documentation) 14 14 * rasters to overlaps (which is necessary to implement lossless vector to raster conversion) 15 16 These arrangement are possible in Oracle as well, but they implies the storage of multiple SDO_GEORASTER objects linked to as many SDO_RASTER table. A complex coverage can lead to hundreds of table in the database. With WKT Raster you can store a similar raster arrangement into a unique table. 15 17 16 18 '''3 - Why do you say "WKT Raster goal is to implement the RASTER type as much as possible like the GEOMETRY type is implemented in PostGIS"? Vector and raster are very different and have always been threated differently in GIS packages.'''