#3044 closed defect (fixed)
d.northarrow: transparent color does not work
| Reported by: | annakrat | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 7.2.0 |
| Component: | Default | Version: | unspecified |
| Keywords: | d.northarrow, cartography, gsoc2016 | Cc: | |
| CPU: | Unspecified | Platform: | All |
Description
Option fill_color of d.northarrow is not respected.
Attachments (1)
Change History (8)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 8 years ago
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
Replying to wenzeslaus:
When the fill color is set to transparent (
fill_color=none) in the G7:d.northarrow, it is rendered asblack.d.northarrow style=arrow1 at=85.0,25.0 color=30:144:255 fill_color=noneSupport for transparency, would increase the number of style options. I can see how even transparent line color would potentially create some interesting options as well.
Other modules support that but if it is too difficult to implement, the transparent option should be removed.
It looks that D_parse_color() returns same value both for input string "black" and "none". Could you provide me an example of module where transparency is already implemented?
by , 8 years ago
| Attachment: | north_transp.diff added |
|---|
comment:4 by , 8 years ago
option text_color added. Transparent color now works. However many symbols are not really transparent and their fill color is just white with no chance to change it.
comment:7 by , 8 years ago
| Milestone: | 7.0.5 → 7.2.0 |
|---|
When the fill color is set to transparent (
fill_color=none) in the G7:d.northarrow, it is rendered asblack.Support for transparency, would increase the number of style options. I can see how even transparent line color would potentially create some interesting options as well.
Other modules support that but if it is too difficult to implement, the transparent option should be removed.