Regress failure for 9.0

[robe]

Output from winnie

Running tests

 check_gdal .. ok 
 check_raster_columns .. ok 

 check_raster_overviews .. ok 
 rt_io .. ok 
 rt_bytea .. ok 
 box3d .. ok 

 rt_addband .. ok 
 rt_band .. ok 
 rt_dimensions .. ok 
 rt_scale .. ok 

 rt_pixelsize .. ok 
 rt_upperleft .. ok 
 rt_rotation .. ok 

 rt_georeference .. ok 
 rt_set_properties .. ok 
 rt_isempty .. ok 
 rt_hasnoband .. ok 

 rt_metadata .. ok 
 rt_raster2worldcoord .. ok 
 rt_world2rastercoord .. ok 
 rt_above .. ok 

 rt_below .. ok 
 rt_contained .. ok 
 rt_contain .. ok 

 rt_left .. ok 
 rt_overabove .. ok 
 rt_overbelow .. ok 

 rt_overlap .. ok 
 rt_overleft .. ok 
 rt_overright .. ok 

 rt_right .. ok 
 rt_same .. ok 
 rt_band_properties .. ok 

 rt_set_band_properties .. ok 
 rt_setvalues_array .. ok 
 rt_summarystats .. ok 
 rt_count .. ok 

 rt_histogram .. ok 
 rt_quantile .. ok 
 rt_valuecount .. ok 
 rt_valuepercent .. ok 

 rt_bandmetadata .. ok 
 rt_pixelvalue .. ok 
 rt_neighborhood .. ok 
 rt_nearestvalue .. ok 

 rt_pixelofvalue .. ok 
 rt_pixelaspolygons .. ok 
 rt_pixelaspoints .. ok 

 rt_pixelascentroids .. ok 
 rt_polygon .. ok 
 rt_utility .. ok 

 rt_asgdalraster .. ok 
 rt_astiff .. ok 
 rt_asjpeg .. ok 
 rt_aspng .. ok 

 rt_reclass .. ok 

 rt_resample .. ok 

 rt_asraster .. ok 

 rt_mapalgebraexpr .. ok 
 rt_mapalgebrafct .. ok 
 rt_mapalgebraexpr_2raster .. ok 

 rt_mapalgebrafct_2raster .. ok 
 rt_mapalgebrafctngb .. ok 
 rt_mapalgebrafctngb_userfunc .. ok 

 rt_intersection .. ok 
 rt_clip .. ok 
 rt_mapalgebra .. failed (diff expected obtained: /c/jenkins/postgis/tmp/2.1.0SVN_pg9.0w64/test_67_diff)

 rt_union .. ok 

 rt_invdistweight4ma .. ok 
 rt_4ma .. ok 
 rt_intersects .. ok 

 rt_overlaps .. ok 
 rt_touches .. ok 
 rt_contains .. ok 
 rt_containsproperly .. ok 

 rt_covers .. ok 
 rt_coveredby .. ok 

 rt_within .. ok 
 rt_disjoint .. ok 
 rt_dwithin .. ok 

 rt_dfullywithin .. ok 
 rt_samealignment .. ok 
 bug_test_car5 .. ok 
 tickets .. ok 

 loader/Basic ..... ok 

 loader/BasicCopy ..... ok 

 loader/Tiled10x10 .... ok 

 loader/Tiled10x10Copy .... ok 

 uninstall .. ok (3740
)

Run tests: 89
Failed: 1

Same failure from Debbie:

See attached output from winnie

[robe]

winnie output

[robe]

Bborie,

If this proves difficult to fix, I'm proposing we drop 9.0 support for 2.1.

I know we said we would only drop 8.4, but I suspect the large majority of users will be using 9.1, 9.2, or 9.3 with 2.1. That will selfishly allow me to make extension the official model for installation for 2.1 :)

[Bborie Park]

Give me a day or two to see what I can do to fix that "ERROR: could not implement GROUP BY". That "GROUP BY" regression test would be very useful capability...

[Bborie Park]

*Sigh* So it looks like PostgreSQL 9.1 is the old version that permits the GROUP BY using HASH opclass. So, I've added code for 9.0 that achieves the same result using the same function but with an additional step. Changes committed in r10429.

[Bborie Park]

As for dropping 9.0 for 2.1, I have to vote no. This is purely because I don't want to upgrade my production database server from 9.0 yet. Not until 9.3 is release. ;-)

[Bborie Park]

Fixed in r10429