Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#2944 closed defect (fixed)
ERROR: aggregate st_astwkbagg(geometry, integer, bigint, boolean) does not exist
Reported by: | strk | Owned by: | strk |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | medium | Milestone: | PostGIS 2.2.0 |
Component: | postgis | Version: | master |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
I cannot upgrade between 2.2.0dev and 2.2.0devnext, due to the change in TKWB aggregate signature:
=# alter extension postgis update to '2.2.0devnext'; ERROR: aggregate st_astwkbagg(geometry, integer, bigint, boolean) does not exist
Source PostGIS version is 2.2.0dev r13012
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
Ah, got it. It's the usual in-development upgrade problem.
The script that generates the upgrade does NOT include the ST_AsTWKBAgg function because it was added in the same version we come from (2.2.0). So there's no such function when it comes to add a comment for it, which is instead added unconditionally.
I've the impression we had another ticket for this issue, and someone suggested to always re-define the "same-version" objects while in "-dev" mode. Remember about it robe ?
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
I'm trying the "same-dev-version" trick. Seems to work.
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
The problem with that is you could still get an error upgrading from a dev version to another revision of the same dev version while having views relying on aggregates. Is that ok to keep ?
The alternative would be to include revision number in the availability tag...
comment:5 by , 10 years ago
With r13013 all aggregates added in a version are always dropped/reloaded when upgrading to the same in-development version (but not when upgrading between patch-levels)
comment:6 by , 10 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
It might be actually related to the comments, as mentioned on the mailing list...