Opened 9 years ago
Last modified 4 years ago
#3148 new defect
Another GUC for PROJSO or can we just figure out the PROJSO?
Reported by: | robe | Owned by: | Bborie Park |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | medium | Milestone: | PostGIS Fund Me |
Component: | raster | Version: | master |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
So I started winnie's path to using proj 4.9.1 in prep for Windows 2.2 release with proj 4.9.1 (to take advantage of new geography goodness), and raster broke.
passed Test: test_gdal_to_raster ...passed Test: test_gdal_warp ...ERROR 6: Unable to load PROJ.4 library (libproj-0.dll), creation of OGRCoordinateTransformation failed. Assertion failed!
proj 4.9.1 creates dll libproj-9.dll
while the 4.8.0 series has libproj-0.dll
I think before libproj-0.dll is the default unless I override it with something else.
But now of course that default don't work with my 4.9.1 library.
So
SET PROJSO=libproj-9.dll
fixes the issue, but given I've got to ship to windows users who have every GIS thing under the sun, plus god knows what other versions of PostgreSQL/PostGIS running, I'd rather not muck with their system environment settings if I don't have to.
It would be really nice if raster was smart enough to figure out which proj it was compiled with, but barring that, I guess I can maybe live with a GUC for PROJSO.
Change History (12)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
Hmm I didn't realize gdal had a direct dependency on proj. I'm using GDAL 1.11.1
which is compiled with this script:
http://svn.osgeo.org/postgis/buildbots/windows/mingw64/scripts/build_gdal.sh
I don't see any reference to PROJ in it.
Last build log for GDAL 1.11.1
http://winnie.postgis.net:1500/view/GDAL/job/GDAL_release/31/consoleFull
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
GDAL definitely has proj4...
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/ConfigOptions#PROJSO
Looking through my local gdal's config.log, I find entries like...
configure:28334: checking how to link PROJ.4 library configure:28347: result: link dynamically.
comment:4 by , 9 years ago
So it's hard-code to search for libproj-0.dll if not passed in according to that link. I had the same issue before I upgrade to proj 4.8.0 when I was using an older 4.6.something that comes in as libproj.dll. We skirted the issue cause upgrading to 4.8.0 made it not a requirement for me to set that variable.
comment:5 by , 9 years ago
Well if this issue only affects me (ie a good chunk of windows users), I suppose I could just cheat and also distribute a copy of libproj-9.dll as libproj-0.dll. That isn't quite as annoying as having to deal with a GUC or environment variable.
though if it does affect others, we should consider doing it.
comment:6 by , 9 years ago
Your compiled GDAL has been hard coded to search for libproj-0.dll as that was found at compilation time. Can you recompile your GDAL?
comment:7 by , 9 years ago
hmm hard to believe it found it at compilation since I don't think I had proj in my search path when I compiled. But I'll go head and recompile and see if it makes a difference.
comment:8 by , 9 years ago
for completeness IRC dialog from EvenR:
<EvenR> robe2: proj dll is loaded through LoadLibrary() <robe2> EvenR: so doesn't matter about compile time right? <robe2> so issue is i installed 4.9.1 <robe2> and if I build postgis against 4.9.1 it still looks for libproj-0.dll <robe2> unless I set PROJSO to libproj-9.dll <EvenR> The default build doesn't need the include files or .lib of proj. But the --with-static-proj configure flag can be used for traditionnal linking <EvenR> ah yes, the .so number has changed. hum
So it does seem like most likedly I'm just getting the default hard-coded name in GDAL 1.11.1. PErhaps GDAL 2.0 will come out before PostGIS 2.2. and I can up to that and it will have proj 4.9.1 as default and this will be a non-issue again.
I really don't want to statically compile in proj into my GDAL since I ship with GAL whatever files (which could be different between versions)
comment:10 by , 9 years ago
Milestone: | PostGIS 2.2.0 → PostGIS Future |
---|
Given the error message and more specifically OGRCoordinateTransformation, I think there's some conflict between proj4 and gdal. What gdal are you using? And which proj was compiled into gdal?