boundary, relate_bnr regression on GEOS 3.9.4

[robe]

Debbie is showing this when testing PostGIS 3.1.8 against GEOS 3.9.4dev

​https://debbie.postgis.net/job/PostGIS_Regress/23080/console

23:56:51 PostgreSQL 11.17 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, 64-bit
23:56:51   Postgis 3.1.8dev - (3.1.7-21-gfe5eb4f54) - 2022-11-06 03:52:59
23:56:51   scripts 3.1.8dev 3.1.7-21-gfe5eb4f54
23:56:51   raster scripts 3.1.8dev 3.1.7-21-gfe5eb4f54
23:56:51   GEOS: 3.9.4dev-CAPI-1.14.4
23:56:51   PROJ: 7.2.1
23:56:51   SFCGAL: 1.3.8
23:56:51   GDAL: GDAL 3.4.3, released 2022/04/22

23:56:51  ./regress/core/boundary .. failed (diff expected obtained: /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/postgis/tmp/3_1_pg11w64/test_4_diff)
23:56:51 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
23:56:51 --- ./regress/core/boundary_expected	2021-01-14 01:11:03.006011680 +0000
23:56:51 +++ /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/postgis/tmp/3_1_pg11w64/test_4_out	2022-11-06 03:56:51.939427452 +0000
23:56:51 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
23:56:51  MULTIPOINT(1 1,-1 1)
23:56:51  LINESTRING(1 1,0 0,-1 1,1 1)
23:56:51  LINESTRING(1 1 1,0 0 1,-1 1 1,1 1 1)
23:56:51 -MULTIPOINT(-1 1 1,1 1 0.75)
23:56:51 +MULTIPOINT(-1 1 1,1 1 1)
23:56:51  LINESTRING(1 1,0 0,-1 1,1 1)
23:56:51 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------


23:57:43  ./regress/core/relate_bnr .. failed (diff expected obtained: /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/postgis/tmp/3_1_pg11w64/test_89_diff)
23:57:44 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
23:57:44 --- ./regress/core/relate_bnr_expected	2021-01-14 01:11:03.070011681 +0000
23:57:44 +++ /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/postgis/tmp/3_1_pg11w64/test_89_out	2022-11-06 03:57:44.017813759 +0000
23:57:44 @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
23:57:44  28|10FF0FFF2|10FF0FFF2|1FFFFFFF2|10FF0FFF2
23:57:44  29|FF1FF0102|FF1FF0102|FF1FF0102|FF1FF0102
23:57:44  30|FF1FF0102|FF1FF0102|FF1FFF1F2|FF1FF0102
23:57:44 -31|FF1FF01F2|FF1FF01F2|FF1FF01F2|FF1FF01F2
23:57:44 +31|FF1FF01F2|FF1FF0102|FF1FF0102|FF1FF01F2
23:57:44  32|FF1FF01F2|FF1FF0102|FF1FFF1F2|FF1FF01F2
23:57:44  33|1FFF0FFF2|1FFF0FFF2|1FFFFFFF2|1FFF0FFF2
23:57:44  34|1FFF0FFF2|1FFF0FFF2|1FFFFFFF2|1FFF0FFF2
23:57:44 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

My local GEOS is 3.9.2ish and doesn't show this and sadly winnie's geos 3.9 builds are broken so couldn't grab a newer binary from her to confirm.

I know we changed the behavior of relate_bnr, so that one I'll just take out the test as I did in master. The boundary one I don't recall but might be related.

[Regina Obe <lr@…>]

In d624047c/git:

Take out relate_bnr tests that gives incorrect answer. References #5282 for PostGIS 3.1.8

[Regina Obe <lr@…>]

In a6966410/git:

Take out GEOS boundary test that no longer agrees in
yet to be released GEOS micros
References #5282 for PostGIS 3.1.8

[Regina Obe <lr@…>]

In 99fda1c/git:

Take out relate_bnr and boundary tests that
no longer agree with newer GEOS micros
References #5282 for PostGIS 3.0.8

[Regina Obe <lr@…>]

In ed8942f/git:

Take out relate_bnr and boundary tests that
no longer agree with newer GEOS micros
References #5282 for PostGIS 2.5.9

[robe]

3.2 and 3.3 already had the relate_bnr tests taken out and the boundary tests are completely different.