#5639 closed defect (fixed)
ST_DFullyWithin fails when dealing with LINESTRING and POLYGON
Reported by: | Wenjing | Owned by: | pramsey |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | medium | Milestone: | PostGIS 3.4.2 |
Component: | postgis | Version: | 3.4.x |
Keywords: | Cc: | nicklas |
Description
Consider the following statement:
SELECT ST_DFullyWithin(a1, a2, 100) FROM ST_GeomFromText('LINESTRING(0 0, 0 1, 1 0, 0 0)') As a1 ,ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON((0 0, 0 1, 1 0, 0 0))') As a2; --actual{f}; expected{t}
According to the definition below, the result of ST_DFullyWithin(a1, a2, 100)
is expected to true
.
Returns true if the geometries are entirely within the specified distance of one another.
Because the geometry a1 is fully within each point of a2 in the distance of 100. The same as a2 to a1. However, Postgis doesn't consider the DFullyWithin relationship. So I believe it is an unexpected behavior here.
Version:
POSTGIS="3.5.0dev 3.4.0rc1-830-g8f77e8a6b" [EXTENSION] PGSQL="170" GEOS="3.13.0dev-CAPI-1.18.0" PROJ="8.2.1 NETWORK_ENABLED=OFF URL_ENDPOINT=https://cdn.proj.org USER_WRITABLE_DIRECTORY=/tmp/proj DATABASE_PATH=/usr/share/proj/proj.db" LIBXML="2.9.13"
Change History (21)
comment:1 by , 10 months ago
comment:3 by , 10 months ago
This is quite bad one, basically handling of max distance for objects that overlap is quite bad.
SELECT ST_MaxDistance(a1, a2) FROM (VALUES ('POINT(0.5 0.5)', 'POLYGON((0 0, 0 1, 1 1, 1 0, 0 0))') ) AS a(a1, a2); SELECT ST_MaxDistance(a1, a2) FROM (VALUES ('POINT(1.5 1.5)', 'POLYGON((0 0, 0 1, 1 1, 1 0, 0 0))') ) AS a(a1, a2); SELECT ST_MaxDistance(a1, a2) FROM (VALUES ('LINESTRING(0.5 0.5, 1.1 1.1)', 'POLYGON((0 0, 0 1, 1 1, 1 0, 0 0))') ) AS a(a1, a2); SELECT ST_MaxDistance(a1, a2) FROM (VALUES ('LINESTRING(0.5 0.5, 1.5 1.5)', 'POLYGON((0 0, 0 1, 1 1, 1 0, 0 0))') ) AS a(a1, a2); SELECT ST_MaxDistance(a1, a2) FROM (VALUES ('LINESTRING(1.5 1.5, 0.5 0.5)', 'POLYGON((0 0, 0 1, 1 1, 1 0, 0 0))') ) AS a(a1, a2);
And this is without getting into really fun cases where the largest distance is found at a vertex in a hole, for example.
comment:4 by , 10 months ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:5 by , 10 months ago
Right. It is tricky to handle overlap cases. Thank you for confirming and explaining.
comment:8 by , 10 months ago
That (point/poly) was the easy one. The cases with line/poly and poly/poly are much harder, I'm not seeing anything that doesn't involve writing an immense amount of net-new code to handle these relatively unused cases.
comment:12 by , 10 months ago
So, this ticket is still valid, though hopefully the fix is more of a special case change than a major re-work. The max distance mode needs a lot more test cases to prove it works as documented (max distance between vertices, no special handling for rings/areas).
comment:13 by , 10 months ago
OK, so back to the actual problem, which seems in this case confined to ST_DFullyWithin.
SELECT ST_MaxDistance( 'LINESTRING(0 0, 0 1, 1 0, 0 0)'::geometry, 'POLYGON((0 0, 0 1, 1 0, 0 0))'::geometry); st_maxdistance -------------------- 1.4142135623730951 SELECT ST_DFullyWithin( 'LINESTRING(0 0, 0 1, 1 0, 0 0)'::geometry, 'POLYGON((0 0, 0 1, 1 0, 0 0))'::geometry, 100); st_dfullywithin ----------------- f
So the maximum distance between vertices in those two rings is indeed sqrt(2). But that... is way less than 100, so something is odd with the ST_DFullyWithin test.
comment:20 by , 10 months ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
@pramsey, did you already have a chance to look at the report? After this is being fixed, we could continue finding and reporting additional potential bugs.