Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#803 closed defect (fixed)
AsGML: In the topoSurface miss the Face and directedEdge tags
| Reported by: | aperi2007 | Owned by: | strk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | medium | Milestone: | PostGIS 2.0.0 |
| Component: | topology | Version: | master |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
In the TopoSurface miss the Face and directedEdge tags
actually it give:
<gml:TopoSurface> <gml:directedFace> <gml:Edge gml:id="E41890">
Instead it must give: (in the version without xlink::href)
<gml:TopoSurface> <gml:directedFace> <gml:Face gml:id="Face_2_71343_1"> <gml:directedEdge> <gml:Edge gml:id=".."> ...
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 14 years ago
comment:4 by , 14 years ago
r6698 introduces directedEdge tags and their orientation. My brain is melting so can't be sure the orientation is computed right. It's hard to say which direction would be plus and which one would be minus. Me I've followed all rings clockwise (shells and holes) given the holes will have a negative orientation of the directedFace... (didn't want to make a double negation).
Did I mention I'm hating GML already ?
comment:5 by , 14 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
This is definitely closed as of r6715 (added final tests for it)
Ouch, the Face "id" is going to take some time to think about. Problem is that we don't have such an identifier as the GML face is not a face of the topology, but only a ring of a possibly holed face.
Are we ever going to use the face ids for xlinks ?